This Letter to the Editor by Jon Kovaciny was published in the September 11, 2009 issue of the Mankato Free Press, in response to this letter, published September 4. Has your letter been published recently? Submit it!
In his Your View published Sept. 4, Scott Urban attempted to connect government-provided health care to natural rights and our nation’s founding documents. His letter was littered with noble-sounding words and emotional appeals, but was wholly inaccurate, in my opinion.
Health care is unequivocally not a right. It’s especially not an American right, as Urban stated several times. Are those living in other countries somehow less worthy? Life, liberty, and property are rights; health care is a responsibility. Don’t confuse the two. Unlike rights, health care (and other goods and services) must be provided by someone. I have no more right to free health services than I would to a free shopping cart full of groceries. Whether I need a dozen eggs or an MRI, it is my responsibility to pay for them. If you need eggs or an MRI, please don’t use the government to forcibly and anonymously extract money from me to pay for what you’ve received.
Government “charity” is not charity at all, and it has destroyed real charity and created a permanent class of dependents. Urban appealed to the Constitution’s general welfare clause to legitimize federal provision of health services. This clause is a common excuse for government to do nearly anything it wants, as someone always benefits whenever the government hands out other people’s money. General welfare is not doing nice things for individuals, but for the good of the Union as a whole.
The Constitution does not and cannot grant fundamental rights, nor can any document or proclamation – it instead prohibits our government from interfering with the rights that all people already have. It is this that made America unique and allowed liberty to flourish.
The original version of this letter, before awkward editing by the Free Press staff, is available here.